During the development of quoeto which spans over multiple years, several cases of medical complications were observed. The multi-dimensional grammar of quoeto appears to pose a risk for self-automation of some cognitive processes. As each dimension of the grammar has very different properties, each personality will react different to their application – and it is hard to say or predict how the effects will be. The main aspect however are association-routings (multilink-association frameworks based on cognitive preconditions). They can cause loops and while in general these loops should not be problematic, psychological preconditions can render them into a significant health risk.
Learning or using quoeto under the influence of drugs etc. is strongly discouraged. It’s important to understand that quoeto is an actual meta-language. You will not find helpful information about this type of language in the internet (2020). The common usage of ‘meta-language’ in the philosophical and linguistic research is by strict interpretation of the term incorret. As the term is already established however, and it might pose to be impossible to change that, we must fall back on the more exuberant notion of a hyper-language.
Any other (human) language can be loaded into quoeto, similar to a plugin or a skin for a program. Though the language does not need a vocabulary, there are different sets of them for specific purposes (e.g. for hilbert spaces, bishop sets, yang-mill etc.). The most noteworthy are for physics, computer science and math. It is not uncommon that obsessions for formalism, codes or math can cause psychological instability when computing with/in quoeto.
ANYONE who has experience with obsessions, has a diagnosed or general tendency or precondition for language disorder, schizophrenia, psychosis, paranoia, cognitive disorders, repetitive language disorders or thoughts or any kind of persistently recurring – / obsessive thoughts as well as other forms of OCD or tourette is strongly advised to drop the idea of learning or developing quoeto. There are no help-pages about the kind of influence on a brain and the type of cognitive effects available and no speech therapist will be able to help you as there is no former research or data on non-chomsky language based thinking and cognition.
It is a possibility that quoeto patterns cannot be unlearned, once trained. They can always be adapted/corrected but it might be very demanding, exhaustive and in cases of prevalent disorders it might even take years. For some it might be impossible to recover without supervision and there are less then a handful of people in the world who would be able to supervise a recorrection therapy from multilink association based identity framework application.
Meta-language as used in the current academic context, internet or in philosophical and linguistic disciplines, refers to: how we use language or how we talk about language etc. Some refer to meta-language as the way we communicate through language aside voice or how communication takes place on other channels except audio and body language. None of these topics have anything to do with (what we are forced to call) hyper-languages (hyperlanguage).
The cases of medical complications did not occur in clinical or academic settings and therefore we cannot make statements about their probability to occur or about their general prevalence. But the negative (recursive) effects even affected individuals without preconditions and even if they were not actively engaging in learning 3d or 4d language.
Individuals spending time on learning / researching hyper-language (HL), their grammar and logic should have a static means of comparison and external source of feedback about their inference and cognition. We cannot make definite statements about HL effects and causes on human brains. As we gathered some experience through the mentioned cases over several years, we must make notion of it and explicitly warn about its effects and hope to have done sufficiently with this guideline.
Even healthy individuals should not learn HL for more then a few hours a day and not more then 3 days a week (rough estimates). Training or learning HL should not be attempted if you are under the age of 25 because the plasticity of brains will fastly become difficult to handle. Above that age the neural structures and pathways are more distinct and robust and less susceptible to automization or rapid recursion-based change. Identity models should always be played and developed under supervision or in community settings with peer-review capacity.